Category Judiciary Notes
Surajmani Stella Kujar v Durga Charan Hansdah, AIR 2001 SC 938 : (2001) 3 SCC 13
Application of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Schools of Hindu Law
SOURCES OF HINDU LAW
Preliminary (Sec.1-4) – Mains Questions – Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Kinds of Jurisdiction: Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
Jurisdiction : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
Introduction to Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908
State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain (AIR 1977 SC 1680)
Iftikar Ahmed v. Syed Meharban Ali, (AIR 1977 SC 749)
Indian Bank v. Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Fed. Ltd. (AIR 1998 SC 1952) – CPC
Gundaji Satwaji Shinde v. Ramachandra Bhikaji Joshi (AIR 1979 SC 653) – CPC
Punjab National Bank v. Surendra Prasad Sinha, AIR 1992 SC 1815 – Limitation Act
Section 17 – Contract to sell or let property by one who has no title, not specifically enforceable – SRA, 1963
Section 16 – Personal bars to relief – SRA, 1963
Section 15 – Who may obtain specific performance, SRA, 1963
Section 14A – Power of court to engage experts, SRA, 1963
Section 14 – Contracts which cannot be specifically enforceable – SRA, 1963
Differences between Bailable and Non-Bailable Offences
Differences between Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offence
Section 13 – Rights of purchaser or lessee against person with no title or imperfect title – SRA, 1963
Section 12-Specific performance of part of contract – SRA, 1963
Section 11 – Cases in which specific performance of contracts connected with trusts enforceable – SRA, 1963
Section 10 – Specific Performance in respect of contracts – SRA, 1963
Section 9 – Defences respecting suits for relief based on contract – SRA, 1963
Section 8 – Liability of person in possession, not as owner, to deliver to persons entitled to immediate possession – SRA, 1963
Section 7 – Recovery of specific movable property – SRA, 1963
Question. On 01.01.2006 ‘A’ occupied an empty plot of land measuring 500 sq. yds which as per municipal records was in the name of ‘B’; government employee. After one year ‘A’ built a two room house thereon. On 15.01.2015 ‘B’ forcibly dispossessed A’. On 05.05.2015 ‘A’ filed a suit under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for possession against ‘B’. ‘B’ contested the suit on the ground that he was the real owner while ‘A’ contended that he was in “settled possession” till 15.01. 2015. Decide. [DJS 2018]
