Civil Law-II DJS Mains 2008
Delhi Judiciary Service Examination DJS Mains 2008 Civil Law-II Q. 1 A had let out his premises to B. As a term of the said letting B had deposited three months rent with A by way of security deposit. Nothing…
advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
Civil Law-I DJS Mains 2008
Delhi Judiciary Service Examination DJS Mains 2008 Civil Law-I Q1. “The maxim is no more than a rule of evidence. It is based on common sense and its purpose is to be enable justice to be done when the facts…
Criminal Law – DJS Mains 2007
Delhi Judiciary Service Examination DJS Mains 2007 Criminal Law Q. 1 Distinguish between cognizable and non-cognizable offence, bailable and non bailable offence, compoundable and non compoundable offence; summary trial, summons trial and warrant trial. Q. 2 Enumerate the coercive steps…
Civil Law-II DJS Mains 2007
Delhi Judiciary Service Examination DJS Mains 2007 Civil Law-II Q. 1 ‘A’ let out his residential house in Delhi to ‘B’ vide registered lease deed dated 15-3-1992. This lease was for a period of three years commencing from 1-3-1992 and…
Civil Law-I DJS Mains 2007
Delhi Judiciary Service Examination DJS Mains 2007 Civil Law-I PART A Q. 1 “The registration of firms in India is entirely based upon the discretion of the firms or the partners concerned”. Comment on this statement.What consequences would follow in…
Criminal Law – DJS Mains 2005
Delhi Judiciary Service Examination DJS Mains 2005 Criminal Law Time: 3 hours Total Marks: 200 This question paper comprises of two parts i.e. Part-A and Part-B. Candidates should answer Part-A and Part-B questions in separate answer sheets. If any question…
Civil Law-II DJS Mains 2005
Delhi Judiciary Service Examination DJS Mains 2005 Civil Law-II Time: 3 hours Total Marks: 200 Even if you do not know the answer, you may attempt the questions as the test is not only of knowledge of law but of…
Civil Law-I DJS Mains 2005
Delhi Judiciary Service Examination DJS Mains 2005 Civil Law-I Time: 3 hours Total Marks: 200 Q. 1 (a) Landlord filed an eviction petition under section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 against tenant on the ground that tenant…
R v Clarke (1927), 40 CLR 227
R v Clarke (1927), 40 CLR 227 Appellant: His Majesty the King Respondent:Evan Clarke Year: 1927 Court: High Court of Australia Judge: Higgins J Country: Australia Facts Crown offered a reward for information that would lead to the conviction of the…
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v Selfridge & Co. Ltd., [1915] AC 847
Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. v Selfridge & Co. Ltd., [1915] AC 847 Appellant: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd. Respondent: Selfridge & Co. Ltd. Year: 1915 Court: House of Lords Judges: Viscount Haldane LC and Lords Dunedin, Atkinson, Parker of…