Category Mains Questions & Answers
What do you understand by “a suit of Civil Nature” ? When may exclusion of Civil Court’s jurisdiction be inferred ? Give two examples. [MPCJ 2009] CPC Mains Questions
What are the principles of evidence?
What is the difference between legal or logical relevancy?
What do you understand by Substantive and Adjective Law? In which category do you place the law of evidence? Explain. [HR.J.S. 2001]
Is birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy? What is presumption as to abetment of suicide by married women? What is presumption as to dowry death? [MPCJ 2018]
How contents of electronic records may be proved and how it becomes admissible in any proceeding? [MPCJ 2015]
Discuss the provision of the Evidence Act under which a confession of one accused can be used against another co-accused. [MPCJ 2013]
What do you understand by “Examination-in-chief’, “Cross-examination” and “Re-examination” of a witness? [MPCJ 2013]
What is secondary evidence? In what cases and after compliance of which legal formality such evidence can be given? Discuss elaborately? [MPCJ 2012]
Discuss the provisions in respect to the ‘communications during marriage’, ’’Official Communications” and “Professional Communications” [MPCJ 2012]
What is “Dying Declaration”? Whether the dying declaration by itself can be the basis for conviction? Give an example with case law. [MPCJ 2011]
How far the findings of a previous Civil case are relevant in a subsequent Civil & Criminal case based on same facts? Explain with the help of case law. [MPCJ 2011]
Define an accomplice. A conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. Explain and state the principles of law involved. [MPCJ 2010]
State the four circumstances where the statements of relevant facts by a person, who is dead and cannot appear before the Court to give evidence, are relevant. [MPCJ 2010]
Define fact, relevant fact and fact in issue. Point out the difference between the last two? [MPCJ 2010]
What are the exceptions to the general rule that ”Hearsay evidence is not admissible”? [MPCJ 2009]