Skip to content
No results
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Legal Jobs
  • Case Materials
  • Bare Acts
  • Judiciary Notes
    • Syllabus
    • Previous Year Papers
    • Constitution of India
    • Law of Tort
    • Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
    • Limitation Act
    • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
    • Specific Relief Act (SRA)
    • Legal Maxims
  • UGC NET LAW
  • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Copy Right Policy
    • Terms And Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
  • DU LLB/LLM
  • CLAT PG 2025
  • AIBE XIX – 2024
Law Faculty
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Legal Jobs
  • Case Materials
  • Bare Acts
  • Judiciary Notes
    • Syllabus
    • Previous Year Papers
    • Constitution of India
    • Law of Tort
    • Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
    • Limitation Act
    • Transfer of Property Act, 1882
    • Specific Relief Act (SRA)
    • Legal Maxims
  • UGC NET LAW
  • Contact us
    • About Us
    • Copy Right Policy
    • Terms And Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
  • DU LLB/LLM
  • CLAT PG 2025
  • AIBE XIX – 2024
Law Faculty
  • Case Summary

Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502; 54 S. Ct. 505; 78 L. Ed. 940 (1934)

Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502; 54 S. Ct. 505; 78 L. Ed. 940 (1934) Facts—Nebbia, the proprietor of a grocery store in Rochester, New York, was convicted of violating an order of the New York Milk Control Board…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U.S. 525; 43 S. Ct. 394; 67 L. Ed. 785 (1923)

Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U.S. 525; 43 S. Ct. 394; 67 L. Ed. 785 (1923) Facts—The Minimum Wage Act of 1918 provided for the creation in the District of Columbia of a Minimum Wage Board. The board was authorized…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

Bunting v. Oregon, 243 U.S. 426; 37 S. Ct. 435; 61 L. Ed. 830 (1917)

Bunting v. Oregon, 243 U.S. 426; 37 S. Ct. 435; 61 L. Ed. 830 (1917) Facts—A statute of Oregon required that any person employed in a mill, factory, or manufacturing establishment should not work more than ten hours a day,…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412; 28 S. Ct. 324; 52 L. Ed. 551 (1908)

Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412; 28 S. Ct. 324; 52 L. Ed. 551 (1908) Facts—An Oregon statute made illegal the employment of women in any mechanical establishment, factory, or laundry for more than ten hours during the day. Muller…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45; 25 S. Ct. 539; 49 L. Ed. 937 (1905)

Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45; 25 S. Ct. 539; 49 L. Ed. 937 (1905) Facts—A New York statute forbade any employee in a bakery of confectionery establishment to be permitted to work over sixty hours in any one…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366; 18 S. Ct. 383; 42 L. Ed. 780 (1898)

Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366; 18 S. Ct. 383; 42 L. Ed. 780 (1898) Facts—Utah enacted an eight-hour day for workmen in underground mines, smelters, and similar places for the reduction of ore and metals, except in the event…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, 118 U.S. 394; 6 S. Ct. 1132; 30 L. Ed. 118 (1886)

Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, 118 U.S. 394; 6 S. Ct. 1132; 30 L. Ed. 118 (1886) Facts—California brought action against the Southern Pacific and other railroad companies for taxes and interest on taxes assessed on their…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113; 24 L. Ed. 77 (1877)

Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113; 24 L. Ed. 77 (1877) Facts—Ira Y. Munn, et al., were grain warehousemen in Chicago, Illinois, and were sued by Illinois for transacting business without a state license in violation of a state statute…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

Slaughterhouse Cases, 16 Wallace (83 U.S.) 36; 21 L. Ed. 394 (1873)

Slaughterhouse Cases, 16 Wallace (83 U.S.) 36; 21 L. Ed. 394 (1873) Facts—These cases arose under a measure that the Louisiana legislature enacted in 1869. The act, motivated by genuine health concerns and by political corruption, regulated the business of…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
  • Case Summary

United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1; 97 S. Ct. 1505; 52 L.Ed. 2d 92 (1977)

United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1; 97 S. Ct. 1505; 52 L. Ed. 2d 92 (1977) Facts—New York and New Jersey entered into a covenant in 1962 agreeing that so long as bonds remained unpaid and…

  • advnaveenmavi@gmail.com
  • February 1, 2024
Prev
1 … 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 … 484
Next
Legal Jobs

  • Project Director Recruitment 2026 – Women’s Inclusion and Leadership in Law (WILL), NLSIU
  • Deloitte Recruitment 2026: Deputy Manager Vacancy (Regulatory – Corporate Laws, FEMA & Compliance) | Delhi/Bengaluru | Apply Online
  • EY Recruitment 2026: Senior Analyst Vacancy in Noida | LL.B. Graduates Can Apply
  • Uttarakhand High Court Recruitment 2026: Law Researcher Vacancy | Law Graduates & Final Year Students Eligible | Apply Online
  • EY Recruitment 2026: Associate – Indirect Tax (Core) Vacancy in Mumbai | Freshers Can Apply
  • Odisha Public Service Commission Recruitment 2026: Language Officer Vacancy in Law Department | 3 Posts | Apply Online
  • Tata Capital Recruitment 2026: Manager (Legal & Remedial) Vacancy in Kolkata | Apply Online
  • Bajaj Finance Recruitment 2026: Senior Cluster Manager Vacancy in Pune | Apply Online
  • Godrej Properties Recruitment 2026: Manager (Legal) Vacancy in Mumbai | Apply Online
  • Amazon Recruitment 2026: Corporate Counsel Vacancy in Bengaluru | Apply Online
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Disclaimer
  • Copy Right Policy
Latest Posts
  • Delhi High Court Clarifies Prior Sanction Requirement for Prosecution of Former Public Servants Under the Prevention of Corruption Act
  • Section 33. What evidence to be given when statement forms part of a conversation, document, electronic record, book or series of letters or papers. – BSA – THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
  • Section 32. Relevancy of statements as to any law contained in law books including electronic or digital form. – BSA – THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
  • Section 31. Relevancy of statement as to fact of public nature contained in certain Acts or notifications. – BSA – THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
  • Section 30. Relevancy of statements in maps, charts and plans. – BSA – THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023

Copyright © 2026 - lawfaculty.in - Adv Naveen Mavi